SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Lam Research Corporation and ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.

SG&A Efficiency: Lam vs. ASE Technology

__timestampASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.Lam Research Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 201413673000000613341000
Thursday, January 1, 201514295000000591611000
Friday, January 1, 201615099000000630954000
Sunday, January 1, 201715767000000667485000
Monday, January 1, 201819552000000762219000
Tuesday, January 1, 201922389000000702407000
Wednesday, January 1, 202023806000000682479000
Friday, January 1, 202127191000000829875000
Saturday, January 1, 202230384000000885737000
Sunday, January 1, 202325930017000832753000
Monday, January 1, 202427353513000868247000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Giants

In the ever-evolving landscape of semiconductor manufacturing, understanding operational efficiency is crucial. This analysis delves into the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of two industry titans: Lam Research Corporation and ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd., from 2014 to 2023.

Lam Research, a leader in wafer fabrication equipment, has consistently maintained a lean SG&A structure, with expenses hovering around 700 million USD annually. This reflects a strategic focus on cost efficiency, crucial for sustaining competitive advantage. In contrast, ASE Technology, a global leader in semiconductor assembly and testing, has seen its SG&A expenses grow by approximately 90% over the same period, peaking in 2022. This increase may indicate strategic investments in expansion and innovation.

While Lam Research's expenses show a steady trend, ASE Technology's fluctuations suggest a dynamic approach to market challenges. The absence of 2024 data for ASE Technology leaves room for speculation on future strategies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025