SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Lam Research Corporation and VeriSign, Inc.

SG&A Efficiency: Lam Research vs. VeriSign

__timestampLam Research CorporationVeriSign, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014613341000189488000
Thursday, January 1, 2015591611000196914000
Friday, January 1, 2016630954000198253000
Sunday, January 1, 2017667485000211705000
Monday, January 1, 2018762219000197559000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019702407000184262000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020682479000186003000
Friday, January 1, 2021829875000188311000
Saturday, January 1, 2022885737000195400000
Sunday, January 1, 2023832753000204200000
Monday, January 1, 2024868247000211100000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive landscape of technology, understanding operational efficiency is crucial. This analysis compares the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of Lam Research Corporation and VeriSign, Inc. from 2014 to 2023. Over this period, Lam Research's SG&A expenses have shown a significant upward trend, peaking in 2022 with an increase of approximately 44% from 2014. In contrast, VeriSign's expenses have remained relatively stable, with a modest 10% increase over the same period. This stability suggests a consistent operational strategy, while Lam Research's rising expenses may indicate aggressive growth or increased operational costs. Notably, data for 2024 is incomplete, highlighting the dynamic nature of financial reporting. As investors and analysts seek to understand these trends, the efficiency of SG&A spending remains a key indicator of a company's strategic direction and financial health.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025