__timestamp | Johnson & Johnson | Novo Nordisk A/S |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 21954000000 | 26760000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 21203000000 | 32169000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 19945000000 | 32339000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 21420000000 | 32124000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 22540000000 | 33313000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 22178000000 | 35830000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 22084000000 | 36886000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 20118000000 | 41058000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 19046000000 | 50684000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 20112000000 | 61598000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 21969000000 | 67377000000 |
Unleashing the power of data
In the competitive landscape of the pharmaceutical industry, understanding the efficiency of Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial. Over the past decade, Novo Nordisk A/S and Johnson & Johnson have showcased contrasting trends in their SG&A expenditures. From 2014 to 2023, Novo Nordisk's SG&A expenses surged by approximately 130%, reflecting its aggressive expansion and market penetration strategies. In contrast, Johnson & Johnson maintained a relatively stable SG&A expenditure, with a slight decrease of around 8% over the same period, indicating a focus on operational efficiency.
This divergence highlights Novo Nordisk's dynamic growth strategy, particularly evident in the significant 21% increase from 2022 to 2023. Meanwhile, Johnson & Johnson's consistent approach underscores its commitment to maintaining a robust yet efficient operational framework. These insights provide a window into the strategic priorities of these industry leaders, offering valuable lessons in balancing growth with efficiency.
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Novo Nordisk A/S vs Pfizer Inc.
Novo Nordisk A/S and Insmed Incorporated: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Novo Nordisk A/S vs CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc.
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Novo Nordisk A/S and Celldex Therapeutics, Inc.
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Johnson & Johnson vs Pfizer Inc. Trends and Insights
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Johnson & Johnson vs Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc.
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Johnson & Johnson and Grifols, S.A.
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Johnson & Johnson and Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Johnson & Johnson and HUTCHMED (China) Limited
Johnson & Johnson vs Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Johnson & Johnson vs Dynavax Technologies Corporation