Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Johnson & Johnson vs Dynavax Technologies Corporation

SG&A Expenses: A Decade of Strategic Spending

__timestampDynavax Technologies CorporationJohnson & Johnson
Wednesday, January 1, 20141776300021954000000
Thursday, January 1, 20152218000021203000000
Friday, January 1, 20163725700019945000000
Sunday, January 1, 20172736700021420000000
Monday, January 1, 20186477000022540000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20197498600022178000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20207925600022084000000
Friday, January 1, 202110015600020118000000
Saturday, January 1, 202213140800019046000000
Sunday, January 1, 202315294600020112000000
Monday, January 1, 202421969000000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

A Tale of Two Companies: SG&A Expenses Over Time

In the world of pharmaceuticals, the financial strategies of companies can be as varied as their product lines. Johnson & Johnson, a titan in the industry, and Dynavax Technologies Corporation, a smaller yet innovative player, offer a fascinating study in contrasts when it comes to Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2023, Johnson & Johnson consistently allocated a significant portion of its budget to SG&A, with expenses peaking at approximately $22 billion in 2018. This reflects their expansive global operations and robust marketing strategies. In contrast, Dynavax's SG&A expenses, while much smaller, have shown a remarkable growth trajectory, increasing by over 750% from 2014 to 2023. This surge underscores Dynavax's aggressive push to expand its market presence and invest in administrative capabilities. The data highlights the diverse financial strategies employed by these companies in navigating the competitive pharmaceutical landscape.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025