__timestamp | Dynavax Technologies Corporation | Johnson & Johnson |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 17763000 | 21954000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 22180000 | 21203000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 37257000 | 19945000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 27367000 | 21420000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 64770000 | 22540000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 74986000 | 22178000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 79256000 | 22084000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 100156000 | 20118000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 131408000 | 19046000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 152946000 | 20112000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 21969000000 |
In pursuit of knowledge
In the world of pharmaceuticals, the financial strategies of companies can be as varied as their product lines. Johnson & Johnson, a titan in the industry, and Dynavax Technologies Corporation, a smaller yet innovative player, offer a fascinating study in contrasts when it comes to Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2023, Johnson & Johnson consistently allocated a significant portion of its budget to SG&A, with expenses peaking at approximately $22 billion in 2018. This reflects their expansive global operations and robust marketing strategies. In contrast, Dynavax's SG&A expenses, while much smaller, have shown a remarkable growth trajectory, increasing by over 750% from 2014 to 2023. This surge underscores Dynavax's aggressive push to expand its market presence and invest in administrative capabilities. The data highlights the diverse financial strategies employed by these companies in navigating the competitive pharmaceutical landscape.
Johnson & Johnson and Merck & Co., Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Johnson & Johnson and Amgen Inc.
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Johnson & Johnson vs Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Johnson & Johnson or Catalent, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Johnson & Johnson and BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Johnson & Johnson and Exelixis, Inc.
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Johnson & Johnson or Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Johnson & Johnson vs Alkermes plc
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Johnson & Johnson and Perrigo Company plc
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Blueprint Medicines Corporation and Dynavax Technologies Corporation
Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Dynavax Technologies Corporation: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Vericel Corporation vs Dynavax Technologies Corporation