SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Mesoblast Limited

Biotech SG&A: Mesoblast vs. Rhythm's Expense Strategies

__timestampMesoblast LimitedRhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014541700001213000
Thursday, January 1, 2015653780003425000
Friday, January 1, 2016522630006311000
Sunday, January 1, 2017350720009518000
Monday, January 1, 20182741500028080000
Tuesday, January 1, 20193698300036550000
Wednesday, January 1, 20205091800046125000
Friday, January 1, 20216358600068486000
Saturday, January 1, 20225796700092032000
Sunday, January 1, 202353107000117532000
Monday, January 1, 202423626000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Biotechs

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing operational expenses is crucial for sustainability and growth. This analysis compares the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of two prominent players: Mesoblast Limited and Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc., from 2014 to 2023.

Mesoblast Limited: A Steady Hand

Mesoblast Limited has shown a relatively stable SG&A expense pattern, peaking in 2015 with a 65 million USD expenditure. Over the years, their expenses have fluctuated, but they have maintained a consistent average, reflecting a strategic approach to cost management.

Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: A Rapid Rise

In contrast, Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc. has experienced a dramatic increase in SG&A expenses, skyrocketing from just over 1 million USD in 2014 to a staggering 117 million USD in 2023. This growth indicates aggressive expansion and investment in operational capabilities.

The data highlights the contrasting strategies of these companies, offering insights into their operational efficiencies and market approaches.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025