Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. or Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biotech Giants: SG&A Cost Management Showdown

__timestampAxsome Therapeutics, Inc.Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201413928301213000
Thursday, January 1, 201524192893425000
Friday, January 1, 201663436486311000
Sunday, January 1, 201772066919518000
Monday, January 1, 2018935152228080000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191359803036550000
Wednesday, January 1, 20202889674946125000
Friday, January 1, 20216664620568486000
Saturday, January 1, 202215925366192032000
Sunday, January 1, 2023323123000117532000
Monday, January 1, 2024411359000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Biotechs

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for sustaining growth and innovation. Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. and Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc. have been on this journey since 2014. Over the years, Axsome has seen a staggering increase in SG&A expenses, peaking at 323 million in 2023, a 23,000% rise from 2014. Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, while also experiencing growth, has managed a more modest increase of 9,600% over the same period, reaching 118 million in 2023.

A Decade of Financial Strategy

Axsome's aggressive expansion strategy is evident in its SG&A trajectory, reflecting its commitment to scaling operations. In contrast, Rhythm's more conservative approach suggests a focus on sustainable growth. As these companies continue to evolve, their financial strategies will play a pivotal role in their success. Investors and industry watchers should keep a close eye on how these strategies unfold in the coming years.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025