SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. and HUTCHMED (China) Limited

Biotech SG&A: Sarepta vs. HUTCHMED Efficiency

__timestampHUTCHMED (China) LimitedSarepta Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20142668400049315000
Thursday, January 1, 20152982900075043000
Friday, January 1, 20163957800083749000
Sunday, January 1, 201743277000122682000
Monday, January 1, 201848645000207761000
Tuesday, January 1, 201952934000284812000
Wednesday, January 1, 202061349000317875000
Friday, January 1, 2021127125000282660000
Saturday, January 1, 2022136106000451421000
Sunday, January 1, 2023133175999481871000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Biotechs

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing operational expenses is crucial for sustainable growth. This analysis compares the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. and HUTCHMED (China) Limited from 2014 to 2023. Over this period, Sarepta's SG&A expenses surged by approximately 878%, reflecting its aggressive expansion and investment in research and development. In contrast, HUTCHMED's expenses grew by about 399%, indicating a more measured approach.

Key Insights

Sarepta's expenses peaked in 2023, reaching nearly 482 million, a testament to its rapid scaling efforts. Meanwhile, HUTCHMED's expenses also saw a significant rise, peaking at around 136 million in 2022. This divergence in spending strategies highlights the different growth trajectories and market strategies of these two biotech firms. Investors and stakeholders should consider these trends when evaluating the companies' future potential.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025