SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited and NetApp, Inc.

SG&A Efficiency: TSMC vs. NetApp's Strategic Paths

__timestampNetApp, Inc.Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited
Wednesday, January 1, 2014217920000024020800000
Thursday, January 1, 2015219740000022921900000
Friday, January 1, 2016209900000025696400000
Sunday, January 1, 2017190400000027169200000
Monday, January 1, 2018200900000026253700000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019193500000028085800000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020184800000035570400000
Friday, January 1, 2021200100000044488200000
Saturday, January 1, 2022213600000063445300000
Sunday, January 1, 2023209400000071464000000
Monday, January 1, 2024213600000096889000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Giants

In the ever-evolving landscape of global technology, understanding the efficiency of Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial. Over the past decade, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSMC) and NetApp, Inc. have showcased contrasting trends in their SG&A expenditures.

TSMC's Strategic Growth

From 2014 to 2024, TSMC's SG&A expenses surged by approximately 300%, reflecting its aggressive expansion and strategic investments. This growth aligns with TSMC's pivotal role in the semiconductor industry, where it has consistently increased its market share.

NetApp's Steady Path

Conversely, NetApp's SG&A expenses have remained relatively stable, with a slight decrease of around 4% over the same period. This stability highlights NetApp's focus on maintaining operational efficiency while navigating the competitive data management sector.

Conclusion

These trends underscore the distinct strategies of these tech giants, offering valuable insights into their operational priorities and market positioning.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025