SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Thomson Reuters Corporation and Waste Connections, Inc.

SG&A Efficiency: Thomson Reuters vs. Waste Connections

__timestampThomson Reuters CorporationWaste Connections, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20149209000000229474000
Thursday, January 1, 20158810000000237484000
Friday, January 1, 20168232000000474263000
Sunday, January 1, 20178079000000509638000
Monday, January 1, 20184131000000524388000
Tuesday, January 1, 20194413000000546278000
Wednesday, January 1, 20203999000000537632000
Friday, January 1, 20211624000000612337000
Saturday, January 1, 20221622000000696467000
Sunday, January 1, 202364000000799119000
Monday, January 1, 2024883445000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Companies

In the world of corporate finance, Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses are a critical measure of operational efficiency. This analysis compares Thomson Reuters Corporation and Waste Connections, Inc. over a decade, from 2014 to 2023. Thomson Reuters, a global leader in information services, saw a dramatic 99% reduction in SG&A expenses, from $9.2 billion in 2014 to just $64 million in 2023. This suggests a strategic shift towards leaner operations. In contrast, Waste Connections, a major player in waste management, experienced a steady increase in SG&A expenses, growing by 248% from $229 million in 2014 to $799 million in 2023. This rise reflects the company's expansion and increased operational scale. The contrasting trends highlight different strategic priorities and market dynamics, offering valuable insights into corporate efficiency and growth strategies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025