Comparing SG&A Expenses: Thomson Reuters Corporation vs Fastenal Company Trends and Insights

SG&A Expenses: Fastenal vs Thomson Reuters - A Decade of Change

__timestampFastenal CompanyThomson Reuters Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 201411107760009209000000
Thursday, January 1, 201511215900008810000000
Friday, January 1, 201611694700008232000000
Sunday, January 1, 201712828000008079000000
Monday, January 1, 201814002000004131000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201914594000004413000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202014274000003999000000
Friday, January 1, 202115598000001624000000
Saturday, January 1, 202217622000001622000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023182580000064000000
Monday, January 1, 20241891900000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

SG&A Expenses: A Tale of Two Companies

In the world of corporate finance, Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses are a critical measure of a company's operational efficiency. Over the past decade, Fastenal Company and Thomson Reuters Corporation have shown contrasting trends in their SG&A expenses.

Fastenal's Steady Climb

From 2014 to 2023, Fastenal's SG&A expenses have steadily increased by approximately 70%, reflecting its growth and expansion strategies. This consistent rise highlights Fastenal's commitment to scaling its operations while managing costs effectively.

Thomson Reuters' Fluctuating Path

Conversely, Thomson Reuters experienced a significant decline of over 99% in SG&A expenses from 2014 to 2023, with a notable drop in 2018. This fluctuation may indicate strategic restructuring or cost-cutting measures. However, the absence of data for 2024 suggests a potential gap in reporting or a strategic pivot.

These insights offer a fascinating glimpse into how two industry giants manage their operational costs over time.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025