SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Viking Therapeutics, Inc. and Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biotech SG&A Trends: Arrowhead vs. Viking

__timestampArrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Viking Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014244195361244910
Thursday, January 1, 2015347180895029636
Friday, January 1, 2016409982094846776
Sunday, January 1, 2017320228805329003
Monday, January 1, 2018191100517121000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019265562579128000
Wednesday, January 1, 20205227589010731000
Friday, January 1, 20218098100010701000
Saturday, January 1, 202212443100016121000
Sunday, January 1, 20239093200037021000
Monday, January 1, 202498761000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Biotechs

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing operational expenses is crucial for sustaining growth and innovation. This analysis delves into the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of two prominent players: Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Viking Therapeutics, Inc., from 2014 to 2023.

Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals has shown a significant upward trend in SG&A expenses, peaking in 2022 with a 410% increase from 2014. This reflects their aggressive expansion and investment in administrative capabilities. In contrast, Viking Therapeutics, while also increasing their SG&A expenses, has maintained a more conservative growth, with a notable spike in 2023, marking a 290% rise since 2014.

The data suggests that Arrowhead's strategy leans towards rapid scaling, while Viking focuses on steady growth. Understanding these trends provides insights into each company's operational strategies and market positioning.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025