__timestamp | ADMA Biologics, Inc. | Summit Therapeutics Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 4823869 | 6795238 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 6745968 | 7454247 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 8494742 | 10345862 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 18092835 | 16984203 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 22502922 | 16187290 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 25910757 | 9299233.54 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 35050817 | 19232000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 42896889 | 23611000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 52458024 | 26700000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 59020000 | 28215000 |
Igniting the spark of knowledge
In the competitive world of biotechnology, strategic spending on Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses can be a key differentiator. Over the past decade, ADMA Biologics, Inc. and Summit Therapeutics Inc. have demonstrated contrasting SG&A spending patterns. From 2014 to 2023, ADMA Biologics increased its SG&A expenses by over 1,100%, peaking at nearly $59 million in 2023. This aggressive spending strategy reflects its commitment to expanding market presence and operational capabilities. In contrast, Summit Therapeutics exhibited a more conservative approach, with a 315% increase over the same period, reaching approximately $28 million in 2023. This divergence highlights differing strategic priorities: while ADMA focuses on rapid growth, Summit appears to prioritize sustainable expansion. Understanding these patterns offers valuable insights into each company's operational strategies and market positioning.
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing AbbVie Inc. and Summit Therapeutics Inc.
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Zoetis Inc. and Summit Therapeutics Inc.
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: United Therapeutics Corporation vs Summit Therapeutics Inc.
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. and Summit Therapeutics Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc. vs Summit Therapeutics Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends
Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc. vs ADMA Biologics, Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Summit Therapeutics Inc. vs Merus N.V. Trends and Insights
Summit Therapeutics Inc. and HUTCHMED (China) Limited: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. or ADMA Biologics, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. vs ADMA Biologics, Inc.
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of ADMA Biologics, Inc. and Mesoblast Limited