Summit Therapeutics Inc. or Catalent, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Catalent vs. Summit: SG&A Cost Management Showdown

__timestampCatalent, Inc.Summit Therapeutics Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20143348000006795238
Thursday, January 1, 20153373000007454247
Friday, January 1, 201635810000010345862
Sunday, January 1, 201740260000016984203
Monday, January 1, 201846260000016187290
Tuesday, January 1, 20195120000009299233.54
Wednesday, January 1, 202057790000019232000
Friday, January 1, 202168700000023611000
Saturday, January 1, 202284400000026700000
Sunday, January 1, 202383100000028215000
Monday, January 1, 2024935000000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

Who Manages SG&A Costs Better: Summit Therapeutics Inc. or Catalent, Inc.?

In the competitive landscape of the pharmaceutical industry, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Catalent, Inc. has consistently demonstrated superior control over its SG&A costs compared to Summit Therapeutics Inc. From 2014 to 2023, Catalent's SG&A expenses grew by approximately 179%, while Summit's increased by about 315%. Despite this, Catalent's expenses remain significantly higher, reflecting its larger operational scale. Notably, in 2023, Catalent's SG&A expenses were nearly 30 times higher than Summit's. This disparity highlights the different operational strategies and market positions of the two companies. However, Summit's rapid growth in SG&A expenses suggests a potential shift in strategy or expansion efforts. As the industry evolves, monitoring these trends will be essential for investors and stakeholders aiming to understand the financial health and strategic direction of these companies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025