__timestamp | Catalent, Inc. | Summit Therapeutics Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 334800000 | 6795238 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 337300000 | 7454247 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 358100000 | 10345862 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 402600000 | 16984203 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 462600000 | 16187290 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 512000000 | 9299233.54 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 577900000 | 19232000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 687000000 | 23611000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 844000000 | 26700000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 831000000 | 28215000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 935000000 |
Unlocking the unknown
In the competitive landscape of the pharmaceutical industry, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Catalent, Inc. has consistently demonstrated superior control over its SG&A costs compared to Summit Therapeutics Inc. From 2014 to 2023, Catalent's SG&A expenses grew by approximately 179%, while Summit's increased by about 315%. Despite this, Catalent's expenses remain significantly higher, reflecting its larger operational scale. Notably, in 2023, Catalent's SG&A expenses were nearly 30 times higher than Summit's. This disparity highlights the different operational strategies and market positions of the two companies. However, Summit's rapid growth in SG&A expenses suggests a potential shift in strategy or expansion efforts. As the industry evolves, monitoring these trends will be essential for investors and stakeholders aiming to understand the financial health and strategic direction of these companies.
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing AbbVie Inc. and Summit Therapeutics Inc.
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Zoetis Inc. and Summit Therapeutics Inc.
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited and Catalent, Inc.
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: United Therapeutics Corporation vs Summit Therapeutics Inc.
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. and Summit Therapeutics Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc. vs Summit Therapeutics Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Summit Therapeutics Inc. vs Merus N.V. Trends and Insights
Summit Therapeutics Inc. and HUTCHMED (China) Limited: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Summit Therapeutics Inc. and Vericel Corporation
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Summit Therapeutics Inc. and Evotec SE
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Catalent, Inc. or Dynavax Technologies Corporation