Summit Therapeutics Inc. or Exelixis, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Exelixis vs. Summit: SG&A Cost Management Showdown

__timestampExelixis, Inc.Summit Therapeutics Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014508290006795238
Thursday, January 1, 2015573050007454247
Friday, January 1, 201611614500010345862
Sunday, January 1, 201715936200016984203
Monday, January 1, 201820636600016187290
Tuesday, January 1, 20192282440009299233.54
Wednesday, January 1, 202029335500019232000
Friday, January 1, 202140171500023611000
Saturday, January 1, 202245985600026700000
Sunday, January 1, 202354270500028215000
Monday, January 1, 2024492128000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

Managing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Biotechs

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for financial health. Over the past decade, Exelixis, Inc. and Summit Therapeutics Inc. have taken different paths in this regard. From 2014 to 2023, Exelixis saw a staggering 967% increase in SG&A expenses, reflecting its aggressive growth strategy. In contrast, Summit Therapeutics maintained a more conservative approach, with a 315% rise over the same period.

Exelixis's SG&A expenses peaked in 2023, reaching nearly 20 times that of Summit Therapeutics. This disparity highlights Exelixis's expansive operational scale compared to Summit's more focused efforts. While Exelixis's strategy may indicate robust market penetration, Summit's leaner model suggests a focus on efficiency. Investors and industry watchers should consider these strategies when evaluating the companies' long-term sustainability and growth potential.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025