Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited and Merus N.V.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared

Teva vs. Merus: Divergent SG&A Strategies Unveiled

__timestampMerus N.V.Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited
Wednesday, January 1, 201438523275078000000
Thursday, January 1, 20158396564717000000
Friday, January 1, 201644781455096000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017164323244986000000
Monday, January 1, 2018118908714214000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019341100003806000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020357810003671000000
Friday, January 1, 2021408960003528000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022522000003445000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023598360003498000000
Monday, January 1, 20243702000000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

SG&A Spending Patterns: A Tale of Two Companies

In the pharmaceutical industry, strategic spending on Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses can significantly impact a company's market position. Over the past decade, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited and Merus N.V. have demonstrated contrasting SG&A spending patterns.

Teva's Consistent Investment

Teva, a global leader, has consistently allocated substantial resources to SG&A, averaging around $4.2 billion annually. However, a noticeable decline of approximately 31% from 2014 to 2023 suggests a strategic shift towards cost optimization.

Merus's Growth Trajectory

Conversely, Merus, a smaller player, has seen its SG&A expenses skyrocket by over 1,400% during the same period, reflecting its aggressive growth strategy and market expansion efforts.

These divergent paths highlight the varied approaches companies take in navigating the competitive pharmaceutical landscape, with Teva focusing on efficiency and Merus on expansion.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025