Thomson Reuters Corporation or IDEX Corporation: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

IDEX vs. Thomson Reuters: A Decade of SG&A Cost Management

__timestampIDEX CorporationThomson Reuters Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 20145044190009209000000
Thursday, January 1, 20154794080008810000000
Friday, January 1, 20164989940008232000000
Sunday, January 1, 20175249400008079000000
Monday, January 1, 20185367240004131000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20195249870004413000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20204949350003999000000
Friday, January 1, 20215782000001624000000
Saturday, January 1, 20226527000001622000000
Sunday, January 1, 202370350000064000000
Monday, January 1, 2024758700000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Managing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Corporations

In the competitive world of corporate finance, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, IDEX Corporation and Thomson Reuters Corporation have showcased contrasting strategies in this domain. From 2014 to 2023, IDEX Corporation consistently maintained a steady increase in SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately $703 million in 2023, reflecting a 39% rise from 2014. In contrast, Thomson Reuters Corporation saw a dramatic reduction, slashing their SG&A costs by over 99% from 2014 to 2023, ending at just $64 million. This stark difference highlights IDEX's gradual scaling approach versus Thomson Reuters' aggressive cost-cutting strategy. Such insights are invaluable for investors and analysts seeking to understand corporate efficiency and strategic financial management. As the business landscape evolves, these companies' approaches offer a fascinating study in balancing growth with cost control.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025