Thomson Reuters Corporation or Rentokil Initial plc: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Comparing SG&A cost management: Thomson Reuters vs. Rentokil Initial

__timestampRentokil Initial plcThomson Reuters Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 20149357000009209000000
Thursday, January 1, 20159657000008810000000
Friday, January 1, 201611976000008232000000
Sunday, January 1, 201713296000008079000000
Monday, January 1, 201813640000004131000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20193225000004413000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20203520000003999000000
Friday, January 1, 20213486000001624000000
Saturday, January 1, 20224790000001622000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023287000000064000000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

SG&A Cost Management: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive world of corporate finance, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Thomson Reuters Corporation and Rentokil Initial plc, two giants in their respective industries, offer a fascinating study in contrasts. From 2014 to 2023, Thomson Reuters consistently reported higher SG&A expenses, peaking in 2014 with nearly 9.2 billion. However, by 2023, their expenses plummeted to just 64 million, marking a dramatic 99% reduction. In contrast, Rentokil Initial's SG&A expenses were more stable, with a notable spike in 2023 to 2.87 billion, a 500% increase from the previous year. This divergence highlights Rentokil's aggressive expansion strategy, while Thomson Reuters appears to have streamlined operations. Understanding these trends offers valuable insights into strategic financial management and operational efficiency.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025