EBITDA Performance Review: Thomson Reuters Corporation vs Rentokil Initial plc

Thomson Reuters vs Rentokil: A Decade of EBITDA Insights

__timestampRentokil Initial plcThomson Reuters Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 20144104000004289000000
Thursday, January 1, 20154087000003151000000
Friday, January 1, 20164890000002999000000
Sunday, January 1, 20175032000001495930891
Monday, January 1, 20181498000001345686008
Tuesday, January 1, 20195806000001913474675
Wednesday, January 1, 20205810000002757000000
Friday, January 1, 20216560000001994296441
Saturday, January 1, 20227670000003010000000
Sunday, January 1, 202311570000002950000000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

EBITDA Performance: A Comparative Analysis

Thomson Reuters Corporation vs Rentokil Initial plc

In the ever-evolving landscape of global business, understanding the financial health of corporations is crucial. This analysis delves into the EBITDA performance of two industry giants: Thomson Reuters Corporation and Rentokil Initial plc, from 2014 to 2023.

Thomson Reuters, a leader in information services, consistently outperformed Rentokil Initial, a global pest control and hygiene services provider, in terms of EBITDA. Despite a dip in 2017 and 2018, Thomson Reuters rebounded with a 123% increase by 2022. Rentokil Initial, on the other hand, showed a steady growth trajectory, culminating in a 182% rise in 2023 compared to 2014.

This data highlights the resilience and strategic adaptability of these corporations, offering valuable insights for investors and industry analysts alike. As the business world continues to navigate economic uncertainties, such financial metrics remain pivotal in assessing corporate performance.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025