Thomson Reuters Corporation vs Global Payments Inc.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored

Cost Efficiency: Thomson Reuters vs. Global Payments

__timestampGlobal Payments Inc.Thomson Reuters Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 201410221070009209000000
Thursday, January 1, 201511476390008810000000
Friday, January 1, 201616035320008232000000
Sunday, January 1, 201719280370008079000000
Monday, January 1, 201810950140004131000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201920738030002431000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202036507270002269000000
Friday, January 1, 202137737250002478000000
Saturday, January 1, 202237786170002408000000
Sunday, January 1, 202337275210004095000000
Monday, January 1, 20243760116000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

Analyzing Cost Efficiency: Thomson Reuters vs. Global Payments

In the ever-evolving financial landscape, understanding cost efficiency is crucial for investors and stakeholders. This analysis delves into the cost of revenue trends for Thomson Reuters Corporation and Global Payments Inc. from 2014 to 2023. Over this period, Thomson Reuters consistently maintained a higher cost of revenue, peaking in 2014 with a staggering 9.2 billion USD. However, by 2023, this figure had decreased by over 55% to approximately 4.1 billion USD, indicating a significant improvement in cost management.

Conversely, Global Payments Inc. exhibited a steady increase in its cost of revenue, starting at 1 billion USD in 2014 and reaching nearly 3.7 billion USD by 2023, a growth of over 260%. This trend reflects the company's expansion and increased operational scale. The contrasting trajectories of these two giants offer a fascinating insight into their strategic priorities and market positioning.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025