Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Thomson Reuters Corporation vs Global Payments Inc.

SG&A Expenses: Thomson Reuters vs Global Payments

__timestampGlobal Payments Inc.Thomson Reuters Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 201412950140009209000000
Thursday, January 1, 201513255670008810000000
Friday, January 1, 201614110960008232000000
Sunday, January 1, 201714882580008079000000
Monday, January 1, 201815342970004131000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201920466720004413000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202028788780003999000000
Friday, January 1, 202133911610001624000000
Saturday, January 1, 202235245780001622000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023407376800064000000
Monday, January 1, 20244285307000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

A Tale of Two Giants: SG&A Expenses Over Time

In the ever-evolving landscape of global business, understanding the financial health of corporations is crucial. This analysis delves into the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of two industry titans: Thomson Reuters Corporation and Global Payments Inc., from 2014 to 2023.

Thomson Reuters, a leader in information services, saw a dramatic 99% decrease in SG&A expenses, plummeting from a peak in 2014 to a mere fraction by 2023. This sharp decline reflects strategic cost-cutting measures and a shift towards digital transformation.

Conversely, Global Payments Inc., a key player in payment technology, experienced a 214% increase in SG&A expenses over the same period. This rise underscores their aggressive expansion and investment in technology to capture market share.

These contrasting trends highlight the diverse strategies employed by corporations to navigate the complexities of the modern economy.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025