Thomson Reuters Corporation vs United Rentals, Inc.: In-Depth EBITDA Performance Comparison

EBITDA Showdown: United Rentals vs. Thomson Reuters

__timestampThomson Reuters CorporationUnited Rentals, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201442890000001678000000
Thursday, January 1, 201531510000002653000000
Friday, January 1, 201629990000002566000000
Sunday, January 1, 201714959308912843000000
Monday, January 1, 201813456860083628000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201919134746754200000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202027570000002195000000
Friday, January 1, 202119942964412642000000
Saturday, January 1, 202230100000005464000000
Sunday, January 1, 202329500000006627000000
Monday, January 1, 20244516000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

A Tale of Two Giants: EBITDA Performance from 2014 to 2023

In the world of corporate finance, EBITDA serves as a crucial indicator of a company's operational performance. Over the past decade, United Rentals, Inc. has demonstrated a robust growth trajectory, with its EBITDA surging by nearly 295% from 2014 to 2023. In contrast, Thomson Reuters Corporation experienced a more volatile journey, with a notable dip in 2018, where EBITDA fell to approximately 31% of its 2014 peak. However, by 2022, Thomson Reuters managed a recovery, reaching 70% of its 2014 levels.

United Rentals' consistent upward trend, peaking in 2023, underscores its strategic prowess in the rental industry. Meanwhile, Thomson Reuters' fluctuating performance highlights the challenges faced in the information services sector. The data for 2024 remains incomplete, leaving room for speculation on future trends. This comparison offers a fascinating glimpse into the dynamic landscape of corporate financial health.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025