EBITDA Metrics Evaluated: Thomson Reuters Corporation vs Fastenal Company

Thomson Reuters vs. Fastenal: A Decade of EBITDA Insights

__timestampFastenal CompanyThomson Reuters Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 20148592980004289000000
Thursday, January 1, 20159157260003151000000
Friday, January 1, 20169002850002999000000
Sunday, January 1, 201710082000001495930891
Monday, January 1, 201811369000001345686008
Tuesday, January 1, 201912059000001913474675
Wednesday, January 1, 202013042000002757000000
Friday, January 1, 202113882000001994296441
Saturday, January 1, 202216309000003010000000
Sunday, January 1, 202317060000002950000000
Monday, January 1, 20241510000000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

A Comparative Analysis of EBITDA: Thomson Reuters vs. Fastenal

In the ever-evolving landscape of global business, understanding the financial health of companies is crucial. This analysis delves into the EBITDA performance of Thomson Reuters Corporation and Fastenal Company from 2014 to 2023. Over this period, Thomson Reuters consistently outperformed Fastenal, with an average EBITDA approximately 110% higher. Notably, in 2014, Thomson Reuters achieved its peak EBITDA, nearly five times that of Fastenal. However, Fastenal demonstrated a steady growth trajectory, with a 98% increase in EBITDA from 2014 to 2023, peaking in 2023. In contrast, Thomson Reuters experienced fluctuations, with a significant dip in 2017. The data for 2024 is incomplete, highlighting the need for ongoing analysis. This comparison underscores the dynamic nature of financial performance and the importance of strategic planning in maintaining competitive advantage.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025