TransUnion and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared

SG&A Spending: Stanley Black & Decker vs. TransUnion

__timestampStanley Black & Decker, Inc.TransUnion
Wednesday, January 1, 20142595900000436000000
Thursday, January 1, 20152486400000499700000
Friday, January 1, 20162623900000560100000
Sunday, January 1, 20172980100000585400000
Monday, January 1, 20183171700000707700000
Tuesday, January 1, 20193041000000812100000
Wednesday, January 1, 20203089600000860300000
Friday, January 1, 20213240400000943900000
Saturday, January 1, 202233700000001337400000
Sunday, January 1, 202328293000001171600000
Monday, January 1, 202433105000001239300000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

SG&A Spending Patterns: A Tale of Two Companies

In the world of corporate finance, understanding a company's spending patterns can reveal much about its strategic priorities. This analysis compares the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of two industry giants: Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. and TransUnion, from 2014 to 2023.

A Decade of Financial Strategy

Over the past decade, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. consistently allocated a significant portion of its budget to SG&A expenses, peaking in 2022 with a 30% increase from 2014. In contrast, TransUnion's SG&A expenses surged by over 200% during the same period, reflecting its aggressive growth strategy.

Strategic Insights

While Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. maintained a steady approach, TransUnion's rapid increase in SG&A spending suggests a focus on expansion and market penetration. This divergence in financial strategy highlights the distinct paths these companies have taken to achieve their business objectives.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025