TransUnion or AECOM: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Comparing SG&A Strategies: AECOM vs. TransUnion

__timestampAECOMTransUnion
Wednesday, January 1, 201480908000436000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015113975000499700000
Friday, January 1, 2016115088000560100000
Sunday, January 1, 2017133309000585400000
Monday, January 1, 2018135787000707700000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019148123000812100000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020188535000860300000
Friday, January 1, 2021155072000943900000
Saturday, January 1, 20221473090001337400000
Sunday, January 1, 20231535750001171600000
Monday, January 1, 20241601050001239300000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

A Tale of Two Companies: SG&A Management in Focus

In the competitive landscape of corporate America, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. AECOM and TransUnion, two industry giants, have shown contrasting approaches over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, AECOM's SG&A expenses grew by approximately 98%, while TransUnion's surged by nearly 169%. This stark difference highlights TransUnion's aggressive expansion strategy, reflected in its higher SG&A costs. Notably, in 2022, TransUnion's expenses peaked at 1.34 billion, dwarfing AECOM's 160 million. However, AECOM's consistent expense management, with a standard deviation of 28.5 million, suggests a more stable approach. As we look to 2024, AECOM's data remains complete, while TransUnion's is yet to be revealed, leaving room for speculation on future strategies. This analysis underscores the importance of strategic SG&A management in sustaining competitive advantage.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025