Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Accenture plc or Adobe Inc.

Accenture vs. Adobe: SG&A Cost Management Showdown

__timestampAccenture plcAdobe Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201454019690002215140000
Thursday, January 1, 201553733700002215161000
Friday, January 1, 201654669820002487907000
Sunday, January 1, 201763978830002822298000
Monday, January 1, 201866018720003365727000
Tuesday, January 1, 201970096140004124984000
Wednesday, January 1, 202074625140004559000000
Friday, January 1, 202187425990005406000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022103343580006187000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023108585720006764000000
Monday, January 1, 2024111280300007293000000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

Optimizing SG&A Costs: Accenture vs. Adobe

In the competitive landscape of global business, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Accenture plc and Adobe Inc., two giants in their respective fields, have shown distinct strategies in optimizing these costs over the past decade.

From 2014 to 2024, Accenture's SG&A expenses have grown by approximately 106%, while Adobe's have increased by about 229%. Despite Adobe's higher growth rate, Accenture consistently spends more on SG&A, reflecting its expansive global operations. In 2023, Accenture's SG&A expenses were about 60% higher than Adobe's, indicating a more significant investment in administrative functions.

This data highlights the strategic differences between a consulting powerhouse and a software innovator. As businesses navigate the complexities of cost management, understanding these trends can provide valuable insights into effective financial strategies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025