Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Accenture plc or Texas Instruments Incorporated

Accenture vs. Texas Instruments: SG&A Cost Strategies Unveiled

__timestampAccenture plcTexas Instruments Incorporated
Wednesday, January 1, 201454019690001843000000
Thursday, January 1, 201553733700001748000000
Friday, January 1, 201654669820001767000000
Sunday, January 1, 201763978830001694000000
Monday, January 1, 201866018720001684000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201970096140001645000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202074625140001623000000
Friday, January 1, 202187425990001666000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022103343580001704000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023108585720001825000000
Monday, January 1, 2024111280300001794000000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

Optimizing SG&A: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive landscape of global business, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Accenture plc and Texas Instruments Incorporated, two industry leaders, have shown contrasting strategies over the past decade. From 2014 to 2024, Accenture's SG&A expenses have surged by approximately 106%, reflecting its expansive growth strategy. In contrast, Texas Instruments has maintained a more stable approach, with only a 3% increase in the same period. This stark difference highlights Accenture's aggressive investment in scaling operations, while Texas Instruments focuses on efficiency and cost control. As of 2024, Accenture's SG&A expenses are nearly six times higher than those of Texas Instruments, underscoring their divergent paths. This analysis provides a fascinating insight into how two successful companies navigate the complexities of cost management in a dynamic market.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025