Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? AECOM or Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.

AECOM vs. Stanley Black & Decker: SG&A Cost Management Showdown

__timestampAECOMStanley Black & Decker, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014809080002595900000
Thursday, January 1, 20151139750002486400000
Friday, January 1, 20161150880002623900000
Sunday, January 1, 20171333090002980100000
Monday, January 1, 20181357870003171700000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191481230003041000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201885350003089600000
Friday, January 1, 20211550720003240400000
Saturday, January 1, 20221473090003370000000
Sunday, January 1, 20231535750002829300000
Monday, January 1, 20241601050003310500000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

Optimizing SG&A Costs: AECOM vs. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.

In the competitive landscape of corporate finance, optimizing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. AECOM and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. have been navigating this challenge since 2014. AECOM, a global infrastructure firm, has shown a steady increase in SG&A expenses, peaking in 2020 with a 133% rise from 2014. Meanwhile, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., a leader in tools and storage, has consistently managed higher SG&A costs, with a notable 30% increase over the same period.

Despite the higher absolute costs, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. has demonstrated resilience, with a significant drop in 2023, suggesting strategic cost management. AECOM, on the other hand, shows a consistent upward trend, indicating potential growth or inefficiencies. The data highlights the importance of strategic cost management in sustaining competitive advantage.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025