Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. or AECOM

SG&A Cost Efficiency: Stanley Black & Decker vs. AECOM

__timestampAECOMStanley Black & Decker, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014809080002595900000
Thursday, January 1, 20151139750002486400000
Friday, January 1, 20161150880002623900000
Sunday, January 1, 20171333090002980100000
Monday, January 1, 20181357870003171700000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191481230003041000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201885350003089600000
Friday, January 1, 20211550720003240400000
Saturday, January 1, 20221473090003370000000
Sunday, January 1, 20231535750002829300000
Monday, January 1, 20241601050003310500000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive landscape of corporate finance, optimizing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. This analysis compares the SG&A cost management of Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. and AECOM from 2014 to 2023. Over this period, Stanley Black & Decker consistently reported higher SG&A expenses, averaging around $2.94 billion annually, compared to AECOM's $139 million. However, the trend reveals a more nuanced story. AECOM's SG&A expenses increased by approximately 98% from 2014 to 2023, while Stanley Black & Decker's expenses grew by about 9%. This suggests that while Stanley Black & Decker operates on a larger scale, AECOM's relative increase in SG&A costs indicates a potential area for efficiency improvements. Notably, data for Stanley Black & Decker in 2024 is missing, highlighting the importance of complete data for comprehensive analysis.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025