Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Apple Inc. or Western Digital Corporation

Apple vs. Western Digital: SG&A Cost Strategies Unveiled

__timestampApple Inc.Western Digital Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 201411993000000761000000
Thursday, January 1, 201514329000000773000000
Friday, January 1, 201614194000000997000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017152610000001445000000
Monday, January 1, 2018167050000001473000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019182450000001317000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020199160000001153000000
Friday, January 1, 2021219730000001105000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022250940000001117000000
Sunday, January 1, 202324932000000970000000
Monday, January 1, 202426097000000828000000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

Optimizing SG&A: A Tale of Two Giants

In the ever-evolving tech landscape, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. From 2014 to 2024, Apple Inc. and Western Digital Corporation have showcased contrasting strategies in optimizing these costs. Apple, with its expansive product line and global reach, has seen its SG&A expenses grow by approximately 117%, reflecting its aggressive market expansion and innovation strategies. In contrast, Western Digital, a leader in data storage solutions, has maintained a more stable SG&A trajectory, with a modest increase of around 9% over the same period.

This comparison highlights Apple's focus on scaling operations and brand presence, while Western Digital emphasizes efficiency and cost control. As the tech industry continues to evolve, these strategies offer valuable insights into how companies can balance growth with operational efficiency.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025