Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Insmed Incorporated or Catalent, Inc.

Catalent vs. Insmed: SG&A Cost Management Showdown

__timestampCatalent, Inc.Insmed Incorporated
Wednesday, January 1, 201433480000031073000
Thursday, January 1, 201533730000043216000
Friday, January 1, 201635810000050679000
Sunday, January 1, 201740260000079171000
Monday, January 1, 2018462600000168218000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019512000000210796000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020577900000203613000
Friday, January 1, 2021687000000234273000
Saturday, January 1, 2022844000000265784000
Sunday, January 1, 2023831000000344501000
Monday, January 1, 2024935000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive landscape of the pharmaceutical and biotechnology sectors, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Catalent, Inc. and Insmed Incorporated have demonstrated contrasting approaches to SG&A cost management.

Catalent, Inc. has seen a steady increase in SG&A expenses, with a notable rise of approximately 180% from 2014 to 2023. This growth reflects their expansive operational strategies and market penetration efforts. In contrast, Insmed Incorporated, while also experiencing an increase, has managed to keep their SG&A expenses relatively lower, with a growth of around 100% over the same period.

The data suggests that while Catalent's aggressive expansion strategy has led to higher costs, Insmed's more conservative approach may offer a more optimized cost structure. However, the absence of 2024 data for Insmed leaves room for speculation on their future trajectory.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025