Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Blueprint Medicines Corporation or Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biotech Giants: SG&A Cost Strategies Compared

__timestampBlueprint Medicines CorporationRhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201478900001213000
Thursday, January 1, 2015144560003425000
Friday, January 1, 2016192180006311000
Sunday, January 1, 2017279860009518000
Monday, January 1, 20184792800028080000
Tuesday, January 1, 20199638800036550000
Wednesday, January 1, 202015774300046125000
Friday, January 1, 202119529300068486000
Saturday, January 1, 202223737400092032000
Sunday, January 1, 2023295141000117532000
Monday, January 1, 2024359272000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Biotechs

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for financial health. Blueprint Medicines Corporation and Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc. have been navigating this landscape since 2014. Over the past decade, Blueprint Medicines has seen its SG&A expenses grow by approximately 3,600%, reaching nearly $295 million by 2023. In contrast, Rhythm Pharmaceuticals has managed a more modest increase of around 9,600%, with expenses peaking at about $118 million in the same year.

A Decade of Financial Strategy

Blueprint's aggressive expansion strategy is evident in its rising costs, reflecting its commitment to growth and market penetration. Meanwhile, Rhythm's more conservative approach suggests a focus on sustainable scaling. As these companies continue to evolve, their SG&A strategies will be pivotal in determining their long-term success in the biotech arena.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025