Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Bristol-Myers Squibb Company or BeiGene, Ltd.

SG&A Cost Strategies: Established vs. Emerging Pharma Giants

__timestampBeiGene, Ltd.Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
Wednesday, January 1, 201469300005699000000
Thursday, January 1, 201573110005001000000
Friday, January 1, 2016200970005002000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017626020004849000000
Monday, January 1, 20181953850004551000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20193882490004871000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20206001760007661000000
Friday, January 1, 20219901230007690000000
Saturday, January 1, 202212778520007814000000
Sunday, January 1, 202315045010007772000000
Monday, January 1, 20248414000000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. From 2014 to 2023, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and BeiGene, Ltd. have taken different paths in optimizing these costs. Bristol-Myers Squibb, a giant in the industry, consistently maintained SG&A expenses around $5 billion to $8 billion annually. In contrast, BeiGene, a rising star, saw its SG&A costs skyrocket from a modest $7 million in 2014 to over $1.5 billion by 2023, reflecting its rapid expansion and aggressive market strategies.

While Bristol-Myers Squibb's expenses grew by approximately 36% over the decade, BeiGene's expenses surged by an astonishing 21,600%. This stark difference highlights the contrasting growth strategies of an established player versus an emerging contender. As the pharmaceutical landscape evolves, these trends offer valuable insights into strategic cost management.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025