Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Bristol-Myers Squibb Company or Incyte Corporation

SG&A Cost Management: Bristol-Myers vs. Incyte

__timestampBristol-Myers Squibb CompanyIncyte Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 20145699000000165772000
Thursday, January 1, 20155001000000196614000
Friday, January 1, 20165002000000303251000
Sunday, January 1, 20174849000000366406000
Monday, January 1, 20184551000000434407000
Tuesday, January 1, 20194871000000468711000
Wednesday, January 1, 20207661000000516922000
Friday, January 1, 20217690000000739560000
Saturday, January 1, 202278140000001002140000
Sunday, January 1, 202377720000001161300000
Monday, January 1, 202484140000001242157000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Incyte Corporation, two giants in the industry, have shown contrasting strategies over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, Bristol-Myers Squibb's SG&A expenses have surged by approximately 36%, peaking in 2022. In contrast, Incyte Corporation's expenses have grown by a staggering 600% during the same period, reflecting its aggressive expansion strategy.

While Bristol-Myers Squibb maintains a steady increase, Incyte's rapid growth in SG&A costs suggests a focus on scaling operations. This divergence highlights the strategic choices companies make in balancing cost management with growth ambitions. As the pharmaceutical landscape evolves, these insights offer a glimpse into how industry leaders navigate financial challenges.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025