__timestamp | Bristol-Myers Squibb Company | Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 5699000000 | 1860000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 5001000000 | 2963000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 5002000000 | 6961000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 4849000000 | 11779000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 4551000000 | 13697000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 4871000000 | 15749000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 7661000000 | 18638000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 7690000000 | 27196000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 7814000000 | 31739000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 7772000000 | 33491000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 8414000000 |
Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data
In the competitive world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMS) and Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc. offer a fascinating contrast in their approach to SG&A cost management over the past decade.
From 2014 to 2023, BMS consistently maintained high SG&A expenses, peaking in 2022 with a 37% increase from 2014. This reflects their expansive operations and robust market presence. In contrast, Protagonist Therapeutics, a smaller player, saw a staggering 1,700% rise in SG&A costs, indicative of their aggressive growth strategy and scaling efforts.
While BMS's expenses are significantly higher, their growth rate is more stable, suggesting a mature and controlled expansion. Protagonist's rapid increase, however, highlights their dynamic entry into the market, albeit with higher volatility. This comparison underscores the diverse strategies companies employ to optimize operational costs in the pharmaceutical industry.
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Merck & Co., Inc. and Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing AstraZeneca PLC and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Novartis AG vs Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company vs Grifols, S.A.
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc.
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Wave Life Sciences Ltd.
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Gilead Sciences, Inc. vs Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc. Trends and Insights
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? GSK plc or Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing argenx SE and Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Opthea Limited and Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Verona Pharma plc and Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.