Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Bristol-Myers Squibb Company or Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.

SG&A Cost Management: BMS vs. Protagonist Therapeutics

__timestampBristol-Myers Squibb CompanyProtagonist Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201456990000001860000
Thursday, January 1, 201550010000002963000
Friday, January 1, 201650020000006961000
Sunday, January 1, 2017484900000011779000
Monday, January 1, 2018455100000013697000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019487100000015749000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020766100000018638000
Friday, January 1, 2021769000000027196000
Saturday, January 1, 2022781400000031739000
Sunday, January 1, 2023777200000033491000
Monday, January 1, 20248414000000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMS) and Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc. offer a fascinating contrast in their approach to SG&A cost management over the past decade.

From 2014 to 2023, BMS consistently maintained high SG&A expenses, peaking in 2022 with a 37% increase from 2014. This reflects their expansive operations and robust market presence. In contrast, Protagonist Therapeutics, a smaller player, saw a staggering 1,700% rise in SG&A costs, indicative of their aggressive growth strategy and scaling efforts.

While BMS's expenses are significantly higher, their growth rate is more stable, suggesting a mature and controlled expansion. Protagonist's rapid increase, however, highlights their dynamic entry into the market, albeit with higher volatility. This comparison underscores the diverse strategies companies employ to optimize operational costs in the pharmaceutical industry.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025