Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Bristol-Myers Squibb Company or Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited

SG&A Cost Strategies: Bristol-Myers Squibb vs. Teva

__timestampBristol-Myers Squibb CompanyTeva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited
Wednesday, January 1, 201456990000005078000000
Thursday, January 1, 201550010000004717000000
Friday, January 1, 201650020000005096000000
Sunday, January 1, 201748490000004986000000
Monday, January 1, 201845510000004214000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201948710000003806000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202076610000003671000000
Friday, January 1, 202176900000003528000000
Saturday, January 1, 202278140000003445000000
Sunday, January 1, 202377720000003498000000
Monday, January 1, 202484140000003702000000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Pharmaceutical Giants

In the competitive world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited have showcased contrasting strategies in this domain. From 2014 to 2023, Bristol-Myers Squibb's SG&A expenses surged by approximately 36%, peaking in 2022. In contrast, Teva's expenses declined by about 32% over the same period, reflecting a strategic cost optimization approach.

A Decade of Financial Strategy

Bristol-Myers Squibb's expenses rose significantly in 2020, coinciding with strategic acquisitions and expansions. Meanwhile, Teva's consistent reduction in SG&A costs highlights its focus on streamlining operations amidst challenging market conditions. This divergence in financial strategy underscores the dynamic nature of the pharmaceutical industry, where companies must balance growth and efficiency to thrive.

Explore the chart to delve deeper into these financial narratives and understand the strategic decisions shaping the future of these industry leaders.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025