__timestamp | Bristol-Myers Squibb Company | Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 5699000000 | 5078000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 5001000000 | 4717000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 5002000000 | 5096000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 4849000000 | 4986000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 4551000000 | 4214000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 4871000000 | 3806000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 7661000000 | 3671000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 7690000000 | 3528000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 7814000000 | 3445000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 7772000000 | 3498000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 8414000000 | 3702000000 |
Cracking the code
In the competitive world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited have showcased contrasting strategies in this domain. From 2014 to 2023, Bristol-Myers Squibb's SG&A expenses surged by approximately 36%, peaking in 2022. In contrast, Teva's expenses declined by about 32% over the same period, reflecting a strategic cost optimization approach.
Bristol-Myers Squibb's expenses rose significantly in 2020, coinciding with strategic acquisitions and expansions. Meanwhile, Teva's consistent reduction in SG&A costs highlights its focus on streamlining operations amidst challenging market conditions. This divergence in financial strategy underscores the dynamic nature of the pharmaceutical industry, where companies must balance growth and efficiency to thrive.
Explore the chart to delve deeper into these financial narratives and understand the strategic decisions shaping the future of these industry leaders.
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Sanofi or Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company or GSK plc: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company vs Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company vs MannKind Corporation Trends and Insights
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Geron Corporation
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Celldex Therapeutics, Inc.
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited and Bio-Techne Corporation
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited vs Viking Therapeutics, Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited and Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited vs Mesoblast Limited
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited vs Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc.
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited vs Celldex Therapeutics, Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends