Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Broadcom Inc. or Autodesk, Inc.

Broadcom vs. Autodesk: SG&A Cost Strategies Unveiled

__timestampAutodesk, Inc.Broadcom Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20141090900000407000000
Thursday, January 1, 20151281300000486000000
Friday, January 1, 20161308900000806000000
Sunday, January 1, 20171310300000799000000
Monday, January 1, 201813925000001056000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201915240000001709000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202017159000001935000000
Friday, January 1, 202118542000001347000000
Saturday, January 1, 202221948000001382000000
Sunday, January 1, 202322770000001592000000
Monday, January 1, 202424430000004959000000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

Optimizing SG&A: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive landscape of technology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Broadcom Inc. and Autodesk, Inc., two industry titans, have shown distinct strategies over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, Autodesk's SG&A expenses grew by approximately 124%, reflecting its investment in growth and innovation. In contrast, Broadcom's expenses increased by nearly 291%, peaking in 2024, indicating a strategic expansion phase.

A Decade of Financial Strategy

Autodesk maintained a steady increase, with expenses rising from 1.1 billion in 2014 to 2.4 billion in 2024. Broadcom, however, saw a dramatic surge, especially in 2024, with expenses reaching nearly 5 billion. This divergence highlights different approaches: Autodesk's consistent growth versus Broadcom's aggressive scaling. Understanding these strategies offers valuable insights into how tech giants navigate financial management in a dynamic market.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025