Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Broadcom Inc. or Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.

Broadcom vs. Broadridge: SG&A Cost Strategies Unveiled

__timestampBroadcom Inc.Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014407000000376000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015486000000396800000
Friday, January 1, 2016806000000420900000
Sunday, January 1, 2017799000000501400000
Monday, January 1, 20181056000000565400000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191709000000577500000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201935000000639000000
Friday, January 1, 20211347000000744300000
Saturday, January 1, 20221382000000832300000
Sunday, January 1, 20231592000000849000000
Monday, January 1, 20244959000000916800000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive landscape of corporate finance, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Broadcom Inc. and Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. have been navigating this challenge since 2014. Over the past decade, Broadcom's SG&A expenses have surged by over 1,100%, peaking at nearly $5 billion in 2024. In contrast, Broadridge Financial Solutions has maintained a more stable trajectory, with a 144% increase, reaching just over $900 million in the same year.

A Decade of Financial Strategy

Broadcom's aggressive expansion strategy is evident in its rising SG&A costs, reflecting significant investments in growth and acquisitions. Meanwhile, Broadridge's steady increase suggests a more conservative approach, focusing on sustainable growth. This comparison highlights the diverse strategies companies employ to optimize operational costs, offering valuable insights for investors and financial analysts alike.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025