Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. or Dynavax Technologies Corporation

Biotech Giants: SG&A Cost Management Showdown

__timestampCatalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Dynavax Technologies Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 2014447365417763000
Thursday, January 1, 2015859701022180000
Friday, January 1, 2016791026037257000
Sunday, January 1, 2017730439927367000
Monday, January 1, 20181587596164770000
Tuesday, January 1, 20193688118774986000
Wednesday, January 1, 20204423375479256000
Friday, January 1, 202149628000100156000
Saturday, January 1, 202258183000131408000
Sunday, January 1, 2023133710000152946000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Biotechs

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for financial health. Over the past decade, Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Dynavax Technologies Corporation have shown distinct strategies in optimizing these costs. From 2014 to 2023, Catalyst Pharmaceuticals managed to keep their SG&A expenses relatively stable, with a notable increase of around 30% in 2023 compared to 2022. In contrast, Dynavax Technologies saw a more dramatic rise, with expenses nearly doubling over the same period. This suggests a more aggressive expansion or investment strategy. While Catalyst's expenses grew steadily, Dynavax's sharp increase in 2023, reaching approximately 15% higher than Catalyst's, indicates a potential shift in operational focus. Understanding these trends provides valuable insights into each company's strategic priorities and financial management practices.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025