Comparing SG&A Expenses: Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. vs Dynavax Technologies Corporation Trends and Insights

Biotech Giants' SG&A Expenses: A Decade of Divergence

__timestampAlnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Dynavax Technologies Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 20144452600017763000
Thursday, January 1, 20156061000022180000
Friday, January 1, 20168935400037257000
Sunday, January 1, 201719936500027367000
Monday, January 1, 201838235900064770000
Tuesday, January 1, 201947900500074986000
Wednesday, January 1, 202058842000079256000
Friday, January 1, 2021620639000100156000
Saturday, January 1, 2022770658000131408000
Sunday, January 1, 2023795646000152946000
Monday, January 1, 2024975526000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

SG&A Expenses: A Tale of Two Biotechs

In the competitive landscape of biotechnology, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Dynavax Technologies Corporation have shown distinct trends in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses over the past decade. Since 2014, Alnylam's SG&A expenses have surged by over 1,600%, reflecting its aggressive expansion and investment in administrative capabilities. In contrast, Dynavax has experienced a more modest increase of approximately 760%, indicating a more conservative growth strategy.

By 2023, Alnylam's SG&A expenses reached nearly 800 million, dwarfing Dynavax's 153 million. This disparity highlights Alnylam's commitment to scaling its operations, possibly to support its innovative RNAi therapeutics. Meanwhile, Dynavax's steadier growth may suggest a focus on optimizing existing resources. These trends offer a glimpse into the strategic priorities of these companies as they navigate the evolving biotech industry.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025