Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated or Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotech Giants: SG&A Cost Strategies Compared

__timestampCorcept Therapeutics IncorporatedProtagonist Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014349160001860000
Thursday, January 1, 2015369490002963000
Friday, January 1, 2016452400006961000
Sunday, January 1, 20176241600011779000
Monday, January 1, 20188128900013697000
Tuesday, January 1, 201910035900015749000
Wednesday, January 1, 202010532600018638000
Friday, January 1, 202112235600027196000
Saturday, January 1, 202215284800031739000
Sunday, January 1, 202318425900033491000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Biotech Companies

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for sustaining growth and profitability. Over the past decade, Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated and Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting approaches to SG&A cost management. From 2014 to 2023, Corcept Therapeutics saw a steady increase in SG&A expenses, rising from approximately $35 million to $184 million, reflecting a growth of over 400%. In contrast, Protagonist Therapeutics maintained a more conservative trajectory, with expenses growing from $1.9 million to $33 million, marking a 17-fold increase. This divergence highlights Corcept's aggressive expansion strategy, while Protagonist's approach suggests a more cautious scaling. Understanding these trends offers valuable insights into how biotech firms balance operational costs with strategic growth, a critical factor for investors and stakeholders in the industry.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025