Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Eli Lilly and Company or Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc

Eli Lilly vs. Jazz: SG&A Cost Strategies Unveiled

__timestampEli Lilly and CompanyJazz Pharmaceuticals plc
Wednesday, January 1, 20146620800000406114000
Thursday, January 1, 20156533000000449119000
Friday, January 1, 20166452000000502892000
Sunday, January 1, 20176588100000544156000
Monday, January 1, 20185975100000683530000
Tuesday, January 1, 20196213800000736942000
Wednesday, January 1, 20206121200000854233000
Friday, January 1, 202164316000001451683000
Saturday, January 1, 202264404000001416967000
Sunday, January 1, 202369412000001343105000
Monday, January 1, 20248593800000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Optimizing SG&A: A Tale of Two Pharmaceutical Giants

In the competitive world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Eli Lilly and Company and Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc, two industry leaders, have shown distinct strategies over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, Eli Lilly consistently maintained higher SG&A expenses, averaging around $6.4 billion annually. In contrast, Jazz Pharmaceuticals operated with a leaner budget, averaging approximately $839 million, about 13% of Eli Lilly's expenses.

Despite Eli Lilly's higher absolute costs, their expenses grew by only 5% over the decade, indicating efficient cost management. Jazz Pharmaceuticals, however, saw a significant increase of 231% in their SG&A expenses, reflecting their aggressive expansion strategy. This data highlights the contrasting approaches: Eli Lilly's steady optimization versus Jazz's rapid growth. As the pharmaceutical landscape evolves, these strategies will continue to shape their financial health and market positions.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025