SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Eli Lilly and Company and ImmunityBio, Inc.

SG&A Efficiency: Eli Lilly vs. ImmunityBio

__timestampEli Lilly and CompanyImmunityBio, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201466208000004326000
Thursday, January 1, 20156533000000226206000
Friday, January 1, 2016645200000094391000
Sunday, January 1, 2017658810000053821000
Monday, January 1, 2018597510000035463000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019621380000046456000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020612120000071318000
Friday, January 1, 20216431600000135256000
Saturday, January 1, 20226440400000102708000
Sunday, January 1, 20236941200000129620000
Monday, January 1, 20248593800000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive landscape of the pharmaceutical industry, understanding the efficiency of Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial. Eli Lilly and Company, a stalwart in the sector, has consistently demonstrated robust SG&A management over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, Eli Lilly's SG&A expenses have shown a steady trend, peaking in 2023 with a 5% increase from the previous year. In contrast, ImmunityBio, Inc., a relatively newer player, has experienced more volatility. Their SG&A expenses surged by over 5000% from 2014 to 2023, reflecting their aggressive growth strategy. This comparison highlights the strategic differences between established giants and emerging innovators. As Eli Lilly focuses on maintaining efficiency, ImmunityBio invests heavily in expansion, each approach offering unique insights into their operational priorities.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025