Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Eli Lilly and Company or Zoetis Inc.

Eli Lilly vs. Zoetis: SG&A Cost Strategies Unveiled

__timestampEli Lilly and CompanyZoetis Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201466208000001643000000
Thursday, January 1, 201565330000001532000000
Friday, January 1, 201664520000001364000000
Sunday, January 1, 201765881000001334000000
Monday, January 1, 201859751000001484000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201962138000001638000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202061212000001726000000
Friday, January 1, 202164316000002001000000
Saturday, January 1, 202264404000002009000000
Sunday, January 1, 202369412000002151000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive landscape of the pharmaceutical and animal health industries, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Eli Lilly and Company and Zoetis Inc. have been at the forefront of this financial balancing act since 2014. Over the past decade, Eli Lilly has consistently maintained higher SG&A expenses, averaging around 6.4 billion annually. In contrast, Zoetis Inc. has managed to keep its SG&A costs significantly lower, averaging approximately 1.7 billion.

A Decade of Financial Strategy

From 2014 to 2023, Eli Lilly's SG&A expenses peaked in 2023, showing a 5% increase from 2014. Meanwhile, Zoetis Inc. saw a 31% increase in the same period, reflecting its strategic expansion. This data highlights the differing approaches of these industry giants in optimizing operational costs, with Zoetis Inc. demonstrating a more aggressive growth strategy.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025