Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Genmab A/S or Exelixis, Inc.

Biotech Giants' SG&A Strategies: Genmab vs. Exelixis

__timestampExelixis, Inc.Genmab A/S
Wednesday, January 1, 20145082900079529000
Thursday, January 1, 20155730500091224000
Friday, January 1, 2016116145000102413000
Sunday, January 1, 2017159362000146987000
Monday, January 1, 2018206366000213695000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019228244000342000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020293355000661000000
Friday, January 1, 20214017150001283000000
Saturday, January 1, 20224598560002676000000
Sunday, January 1, 20235427050003297000000
Monday, January 1, 20244921280003790000000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Biotech Giants

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Genmab A/S and Exelixis, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting strategies in this area. From 2014 to 2023, Genmab A/S saw its SG&A expenses skyrocket by over 4,000%, reaching a peak in 2023. In contrast, Exelixis, Inc. experienced a more modest increase of approximately 970% during the same period.

A Decade of Financial Strategy

Genmab A/S's aggressive expansion is evident in its rising SG&A costs, which reflect its strategic investments in growth and market penetration. Meanwhile, Exelixis, Inc. has maintained a more conservative approach, focusing on steady growth and cost management. This divergence highlights the different paths companies can take in the biotech sector, balancing between rapid expansion and sustainable growth.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025