Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Genmab A/S or Grifols, S.A.

Genmab vs. Grifols: A Decade of SG&A Strategies

__timestampGenmab A/SGrifols, S.A.
Wednesday, January 1, 201479529000660772000
Thursday, January 1, 201591224000736435000
Friday, January 1, 2016102413000775266000
Sunday, January 1, 2017146987000860348000
Monday, January 1, 2018213695000814775000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019342000000942821000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020661000000985616000
Friday, January 1, 202112830000001061508000
Saturday, January 1, 202226760000001190423000
Sunday, January 1, 202332970000001254234000
Monday, January 1, 20243790000000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Genmab A/S and Grifols, S.A. have showcased contrasting strategies in this domain. From 2014 to 2023, Genmab A/S's SG&A expenses surged by over 4,000%, reflecting its aggressive expansion and investment in growth. In contrast, Grifols, S.A. maintained a more stable trajectory, with a modest increase of around 90% during the same period.

Genmab's strategy appears to focus on scaling operations rapidly, as evidenced by its expenses peaking at nearly three times those of Grifols by 2023. Meanwhile, Grifols's steady approach suggests a focus on efficiency and cost control. This divergence highlights the strategic choices companies make in balancing growth with operational efficiency, offering valuable insights for investors and industry analysts alike.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025