Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Genmab A/S or Viridian Therapeutics, Inc.

SG&A Cost Management: Genmab vs. Viridian

__timestampGenmab A/SViridian Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014795290007751000
Thursday, January 1, 20159122400010251000
Friday, January 1, 20161024130009575000
Sunday, January 1, 201714698700010912000
Monday, January 1, 201821369500011049000
Tuesday, January 1, 201934200000011646000
Wednesday, January 1, 202066100000013265000
Friday, January 1, 2021128300000025805000
Saturday, January 1, 2022267600000035182000
Sunday, January 1, 2023329700000094999000
Monday, January 1, 20243790000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for financial health. Genmab A/S and Viridian Therapeutics, Inc. offer a fascinating study in contrasts over the past decade.

Genmab A/S: A Steady Climb

From 2014 to 2023, Genmab A/S saw its SG&A expenses rise significantly, peaking at a staggering 3.3 billion in 2023. This represents a growth of over 4,000% from its 2014 figures. Such an increase suggests aggressive expansion and investment in administrative capabilities.

Viridian Therapeutics, Inc.: A Conservative Approach

In contrast, Viridian Therapeutics, Inc. maintained a more conservative trajectory. Their SG&A expenses grew from 7.8 million in 2014 to 95 million in 2023, a more modest increase of approximately 1,100%. This indicates a more controlled approach to cost management.

Conclusion

While Genmab A/S's strategy reflects rapid growth, Viridian's approach suggests a focus on sustainable expansion. Both strategies have their merits, depending on the company's long-term goals.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025