Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Gilead Sciences, Inc. or Bausch Health Companies Inc.

SG&A Cost Optimization: Gilead vs. Bausch Health

__timestampBausch Health Companies Inc.Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201420263000002983000000
Thursday, January 1, 201526827000003426000000
Friday, January 1, 201628100000003398000000
Sunday, January 1, 201725820000003878000000
Monday, January 1, 201824730000004056000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201925540000004381000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202023670000005151000000
Friday, January 1, 202126240000005246000000
Saturday, January 1, 202226250000005673000000
Sunday, January 1, 202329170000006090000000
Monday, January 1, 20246091000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive landscape of the pharmaceutical industry, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Bausch Health Companies Inc. have demonstrated contrasting strategies in optimizing these costs.

From 2014 to 2023, Gilead Sciences consistently reported higher SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately $6.1 billion in 2023. This represents a 104% increase from their 2014 expenses. In contrast, Bausch Health's SG&A expenses grew by about 44% over the same period, reaching nearly $2.9 billion in 2023.

While Gilead's higher expenses might reflect aggressive marketing and expansion strategies, Bausch Health's more modest increase suggests a focus on cost efficiency. Understanding these trends provides valuable insights into each company's operational priorities and financial health.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025