Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Gilead Sciences, Inc. or Catalent, Inc.

SG&A Cost Management: Gilead vs. Catalent

__timestampCatalent, Inc.Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20143348000002983000000
Thursday, January 1, 20153373000003426000000
Friday, January 1, 20163581000003398000000
Sunday, January 1, 20174026000003878000000
Monday, January 1, 20184626000004056000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20195120000004381000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20205779000005151000000
Friday, January 1, 20216870000005246000000
Saturday, January 1, 20228440000005673000000
Sunday, January 1, 20238310000006090000000
Monday, January 1, 2024935000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive landscape of the pharmaceutical and biotechnology sectors, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Catalent, Inc. have taken different paths in optimizing these costs over the past decade.

From 2014 to 2023, Catalent, Inc. has seen a steady increase in SG&A expenses, rising from approximately $334 million to $831 million, marking a growth of about 149%. In contrast, Gilead Sciences, Inc. experienced a 104% increase, from $2.98 billion to $6.09 billion over the same period.

While Gilead's expenses are significantly higher, the growth rate is more moderate compared to Catalent. This suggests that Gilead may have a more stable approach to managing these costs, despite the larger absolute figures. However, the absence of data for Gilead in 2024 leaves room for speculation on future trends.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025