Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Gilead Sciences, Inc. or Pharming Group N.V.

Gilead vs. Pharming: A Decade of SG&A Cost Management

__timestampGilead Sciences, Inc.Pharming Group N.V.
Wednesday, January 1, 201429830000004042025
Thursday, January 1, 201534260000005279557
Friday, January 1, 201633980000008073913
Sunday, January 1, 2017387800000044864073
Monday, January 1, 2018405600000053488904
Tuesday, January 1, 2019438100000065896361
Wednesday, January 1, 2020515100000069968267
Friday, January 1, 2021524600000092047281
Saturday, January 1, 20225673000000131819000
Sunday, January 1, 2023609000000087501000
Monday, January 1, 20246091000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Pharming Group N.V. offer a fascinating study in contrasts over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, Gilead's SG&A expenses have surged by over 100%, peaking at $6.09 billion in 2023. In contrast, Pharming Group's expenses, though significantly lower, have increased by more than 2,000%, reaching approximately $87.5 million in the same year.

While Gilead's larger scale allows for higher absolute expenses, Pharming's rapid growth in SG&A costs reflects its aggressive expansion strategy. This data highlights the different paths these companies have taken in optimizing their operational costs. As the pharmaceutical landscape evolves, the ability to manage these expenses effectively will be a key determinant of future success.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025