SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Dynavax Technologies Corporation and Novavax, Inc.

Biotech Giants' SG&A: Dynavax vs. Novavax Over a Decade

__timestampDynavax Technologies CorporationNovavax, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20141776300019928000
Thursday, January 1, 20152218000030842000
Friday, January 1, 20163725700046527000
Sunday, January 1, 20172736700034451000
Monday, January 1, 20186477000034409000
Tuesday, January 1, 20197498600034417000
Wednesday, January 1, 202079256000145290000
Friday, January 1, 2021100156000298358000
Saturday, January 1, 2022131408000488691000
Sunday, January 1, 2023152946000468946000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Biotechs

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing operational costs is crucial for success. This analysis delves into the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of Dynavax Technologies Corporation and Novavax, Inc. over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, Dynavax's SG&A expenses grew by approximately 760%, while Novavax saw an astonishing increase of over 2,250%.

Dynavax Technologies Corporation

Dynavax started with a modest SG&A expense of $17.8 million in 2014, which surged to $152.9 million by 2023. This growth reflects their strategic investments in marketing and administration to support their expanding product portfolio.

Novavax, Inc.

Novavax, on the other hand, experienced a dramatic rise from $19.9 million in 2014 to $468.9 million in 2023. This spike is indicative of their aggressive push in the vaccine market, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Both companies illustrate different strategies in managing SG&A expenses, offering insights into their operational priorities and market positioning.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025