__timestamp | Dynavax Technologies Corporation | Novavax, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 17763000 | 19928000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 22180000 | 30842000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 37257000 | 46527000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 27367000 | 34451000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 64770000 | 34409000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 74986000 | 34417000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 79256000 | 145290000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 100156000 | 298358000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 131408000 | 488691000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 152946000 | 468946000 |
Igniting the spark of knowledge
In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing operational costs is crucial for success. This analysis delves into the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of Dynavax Technologies Corporation and Novavax, Inc. over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, Dynavax's SG&A expenses grew by approximately 760%, while Novavax saw an astonishing increase of over 2,250%.
Dynavax started with a modest SG&A expense of $17.8 million in 2014, which surged to $152.9 million by 2023. This growth reflects their strategic investments in marketing and administration to support their expanding product portfolio.
Novavax, on the other hand, experienced a dramatic rise from $19.9 million in 2014 to $468.9 million in 2023. This spike is indicative of their aggressive push in the vaccine market, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Both companies illustrate different strategies in managing SG&A expenses, offering insights into their operational priorities and market positioning.
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Novo Nordisk A/S and Novavax, Inc.
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? AstraZeneca PLC or Dynavax Technologies Corporation
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Pfizer Inc. vs Dynavax Technologies Corporation
Gilead Sciences, Inc. vs Novavax, Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. and Dynavax Technologies Corporation
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Summit Therapeutics Inc. and Dynavax Technologies Corporation
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Grifols, S.A. or Novavax, Inc.
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc. vs Dynavax Technologies Corporation
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: MorphoSys AG vs Novavax, Inc.
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. or Novavax, Inc.
Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated vs Dynavax Technologies Corporation: SG&A Expense Trends
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Dynavax Technologies Corporation or BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.